Mutual Respect for Competitors

December 21, 2010

It’s difficult when you work for a Services organisation to find appropriate inflection points to blog. Many of my day to day experiences involve customers throughout Asia Pacific region – many of whom (quite rightly) value their privacy and nature of our confidential relationship.

This topic is a little different as it speaks more broadly of our role as responsible players in the marketplace.

Firstly… I’d recommend you take a few minutes to read this post (and it’s accompanying comments): http://forcemonkey.blogspot.com/2010/12/why-hate-for-salesforcecom-crm.html

One positive aspect, yet often unknown, aspect of Microsoft is its deep respect of its competitors. Unfortunately this respect is often overshadowed by the over caffeinated activities of Microsoft’s marketing teams. At Microsoft we went out of our way to respect, understand and praise competitors – especially in front of customers. Instead of thinking about competitors as ‘evil’ or ‘danger’ we built a mature understanding of their circumstances. Doing so enabled us to emulate their success, avoid their failures and move into new markets.

Salesforce is a competitor of mine and I have deep genuine respect for their company and their products. At times they do get a little carried away with their ‘Oracle bashing’ and ‘Microsoft bashing’ – but beyond their marketeers and larger than life CEO you will find a group of people deeply committed to customer scenarios. For every piece of ‘jest’ there is x10 as much legitimate vision. It is this commitment to scenarios which binds us together as an industry. It is what separates professionals committed to helping customers from those simply wishing to ‘yell the loudest’ about quasi-religious allegiances.

On Microsoft’s front there has been a lot of negative ‘campaigning’ and this is unfortunate. Microsoft does have a good story to tell about CRM 2011 and it s a story which doesn’t require 1:1 comparisons with SFDC. There are fundamental differences in each offering and both have distinct strengths and weaknesses. Now it is no secret that my preference is MSCRM and I genuinely believe that it presents better value in most circumstances than SFDC. This doesn’t mean that SFDC customers have made a grave error: they made the best decision at the time with the information available.

Ultimately we must compete with each other. Let’s try and compete on features, price, experience and vision. Let’s understand that each of our offerings are different and sometimes complementary.

Sydney Dynamics CRM User Group

March 22, 2010

Guy Riddle and I are speaking tomorrow at the Sydney Dynamics CRM User Group. Come along for some fun CRM content.

Where: Microsoft Australia. 1 Epping Road, North Ryde NSW

When: Tuesday March 23rd 2010. 6:00pm

Link: http://www.mscrm.com.au/UserGroups/Sydney/tabid/59/Default.aspx

Resonance

March 3, 2010

Joel Spolsky’s latest Inc column really resonated with me. As the months fly by I find it harder and harder to find the desire to engage in public discourse.

When I worked for Microsoft on CRM it just felt natural. There was information which I had that others wished to consume. At the blogging was ‘going mainstream’ (some would say jumping the shark) and it seemed like the perfect medium. The content was raw yet knowledgeable and it lacked the often sterile corporate tone of technical Microsoft sites.

Then I went on to Azure. The project was ‘half-secret’ and much of my work was internally focused. There just didn’t seem to be much to talk about.

Now I find myself out in the real world. It’s hard to talk about recent customer interactions without betraying their confidence. I spend time in our private Avanade CRM distribution list – quickly answering questions and disseminating topical info. In our industry I think it’s critical that one participates in a technical community. For now that community is closed: its my customers and it’s my peers. In short: less blogging – more emailing & meetings.

That being said I do want to become more involved with Open Source. The CRM space is ripe for activity here. With CRM5 on the horizon I think there is a great opportunity for a group of like minded individuals to go after a specific ‘problem’. With a small time investment by a core team (backed up by a larger community of testers and tirekickers) I think we could some cool things. I’m tired of seeing ‘dead’ CRM projects on CodePlex. It’s time we did something with some life…

Ouch

February 4, 2010

Most people only briefly fantasize about writing a NY Times Opinion Piece about their former employer. Dick Brass lived out that fantasy today: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/04/opinion/04brass.html. To me it smacks of ‘old news’. Yes; Microsoft is a competitive tribal environment. Yes; Microsoft makes lots of $$. Yes; Microsoft is currently capturing the public imagination. What Brass fails to see is that imagination doesn’t always translate into $$. Microsoft has evolved it’s business (and perhaps in doing so left money on the table for Apple). I find it curious that not dominating every market is perceived to be a sin for Microsoft. Isn’t it OK to simply compete and make a solid profit at the same time. Does Microsoft always have to dominate every market (and in doing so incur the wrath of those who will inevitably cry ‘Monopoly!’).

Brass’ piece is indicative of America’s confusion about what their capitalist icons should be. He seems to imply that to be successful today a corporation needs not only have enormous marketshare, revenue, profit and a cult like following. I’ll skip the cult thanks…. and I’m sure most of Microsoft’s customers would be happy to do so as well.

The Internet is a Utility

February 4, 2010

Many people will view the iiNET victory today as pure piracy related decision. For me the success of iiNET is a victory for the ‘internet as a utility’. I believe that an open internet is essential to the economic advancement of this country. The openess of the internet seems to be under constant attack around the world: blacklists, deep packet inspection and copyright policing.

In this era of utility de-regulation we must recognize the internet for what it is: a critical piece of our national infrastructure.

Now to piracy. I’m by no means an advocate for piracy. I’m also moderately offended by these ‘pirate parties’ who have spread their naive brand of idealism here to our shores. However I’m also no fan of the music/media companies who stick to an unpopular business model. I’d spend more money on their products if they would deliver them in modern and respectful ways. Since they generally refuse to do that (especially in this country) I simply don’t consume their product.

What the applicants in the iiNET action did is disgraceful. They targeted a utility provider in a effort to defend their dead business models. I can only hope that this victory is cast in the right context: the defense of the internet utilities. I will no doubt loathe the response of the techno-anarchist ‘spokespirates’ and their inevitable celebration of the court victory.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.